who graded the coin ms-63? that coin doesn't have mint luster and i see scratches and dings not bags now i don't grade Eisenhower dollars ever... so i wouldn't know the finer details that would give the coin it's strike and wear grade, but this is not the luster of an ms-63 coin.... maybe i am wrong maybe it is the lighting. That is why grading is objective.
I graded the coin. Is there a Grand Wizard sowewhere that is supposed to charge a fee for grading? That takes all the liberty out of a very democratic hobby :)
Thank you for your input. Yes, grading is objective. Clinton thought a fat chick was awesome when he coulda been doin' Heidi Klum. To each his own.
^lol i liked that comment. yes that magic grand wizard is pcgs founder David Hall. If you ask me pcgs is worse then the kkk because the charge more money for membership. lol Steven hawking did black holes not light Einstein did work with time not light although several of his works had to do with light they were not the main focus. The key was time. btw
can't say anything about Clinton you got me there =p
glad to see someone on this site be able to take my opinion and ( i won't even call it criticism it is more skepticism) without 1 blocking me..... 2 and or getting all defensive and mad.... thank you for that
LOL. Blocing people is the last thing from my mind. This site, and the auctions I list and the ones I bid on, thrive on a free (and hopefully good-humored) exchange of information as much as it does one a free exchange of goods. Black holes suck in light, and that goofy footnote about time travel in Einstein's bio deals with exceeding the speed of light. In fact he got in trouble in grade school for asking "teacher, what is light made of?"
Defensive and mad about an Eisenhower dollar? Not this member. I like the ribbing :)